Dear visitor, welcome to SCOOTERTECHNO.COM. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Again a topic about ripping, we know already that Scooter ripped much on this album, why must there always be new topics about this fact, isn't one topic enough !!![]()

... Several days ago, I rated the new album with the highest grade, because that final product sounds great...
. To steal melodies from the same music genre !? Stelaing melodies form techno artists ???
... Especially when I know (when we all know) Scooter can do extremely well by their own (the first chapter, for example...). And I know their songs will be better if they write it themselves... Now, I can't listen any of their songs without asking what melody is theirs, did they make some other tunes I worship by ripping melodies.... My whole idea of Scooter be the bast band in the world have relied on the fact they make their own melodies and sounds... If that's true, please, someone give me some consolation...
..that's why I'm so sad right now...
They ripped parts from other hardstyle producers, but not all from Technoboy, and not half of his album like he says, that isnt true. And Ti Sento is also a cover by Technoboy, not an own track, so one can't be angry that Scooter decided to cover the same track, Scooter have even the original singer in their track that recorded the vocals again this year especially for Scooter.

This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Scooterworld" (Oct 8th 2009, 11:40am)
I think ripped songs are good, like My Eyes Are Dry or Rock Bottom etc., but originals are much better.
So I voted for the 4th opinion.
As far as I know in MEAD the artist was in the credits, so that's a cover, not a rip in that case
