SCOOTERTECHNO.COM

Quoted from "Mr Hyper"

Further the name of the remixers can also be decisive - maybe even more than the quality of their remixes itself (because people think "cool, dj xy/band x/y made a remix for Scooter - I must have it!").

Nonsense. While a portion of your post is correct, a great quantity of it is fallacious.

The success generated from either a new album or single release is predicated on the extensibility of its promotion. Casual listeners of the music scene exhibit very little interest toward who did or did not modify the track--they, like myself, couldn't care less. And there are millions of others like me who pay little attention to the trends of the music scenes themselves, for they are simply too inconsequential to matter to the majority of subscribers. The music philosophy I ascribe my liking to is devoid of predilection. In other words, we'll purchase the track that we're aware of and have reasonably enjoyed.

The position acquired by this single and the album itself will take into account a series of uncountable factors. But the most important of them all is the promotion of the product itself, for without it, these items aren't going to receive the recognition or acknowledgement they so rightly deserve. The idea that a significant amount of listeners will be allured to the single because of the producers of certain remixes is false, for the effect is far too marginal to have a noticeable impact at all. You are a very insignificant minority.

Incidentally, when has the number of tracks on the single ever come into purchasable dispute? Do you have any evidence that would suggest that the greater quantity of the music scene evaluates the quality of the product based on the number of tracks?